Abstract

Evidence suggests that college students with disabilities (SWDs) continue to encounter attitudinal and physical barriers while institutions endeavor to offer reasonable supports—mainly in the form of accommodations and modifications. In practice, disability is largely treated as something external and ancillary, with most colleges administering measured allowances, but otherwise managing to avoid change. However, as we proceed into the 21st century, very little seems assured, least of all the status quo. Under the dominant neoliberal regime, virtually everything and everyone is valued in proportion with their perceived economic utility. No longer is higher education widely embraced as a public good. Instead, there is increased scrutiny of the academe with an eye for “value added”, and the returns students can expect with regard to careers and earning potential. Viewed through this narrow hegemonic lens, SWDs must assimilate or transcend their perceived impairments if they are to belong. In this commentary, I introduce key concepts from the environmental philosophy/theory of Deep Ecology to the scholarship of disability in higher education and assert that disability in academe has an “intrinsic value”, irrespective of expected economic utility. I conclude by discussing ways that the deep valuing of disability can lead to the identification of novel veins of inquiry, bolster critical analyses, and help facilitate meaningful change in uncertain times.

Highlights

  • This commentary introduces the philosophy of Arne Naess and “Deep Ecology” to the disability in higher education research literature

  • Throughout this piece, I offer my thoughts on how research into the experiences of college students with disabilities (SWDs) can derive inspiration and direction from Naess and the Deep Ecology movement, improving our capacity to understand, value, and support college SWDs

  • Reject the idea that a student’s value to a campus or academic discipline is proportional with their apparent potential to contribute toward the economy and the upward distribution of wealth

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This commentary introduces the philosophy of Arne Naess and “Deep Ecology” to the disability in higher education research literature. Throughout this piece, I offer my thoughts on how research into the experiences of college students with disabilities (SWDs) can derive inspiration and direction from Naess and the Deep Ecology movement, improving our capacity to understand, value, and support college SWDs

Arne Naess and Deep Ecology
The Need for a Deep Perspective
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.