Abstract
In this article we present a new eye movement control framework that describes the interaction between fixation durations and regressive saccades during reading: The Information Gathering Framework (IGF).Based on the FC model proposed by Bicknell and Levy [15], the basic idea of the IGF is that a confidence level for each word is computed while being monitored by three independent thresholds. These thresholds shape eye movement behavior by increasing fixation duration, triggering a regression, or guiding regression target selection. In this way, the IGF does not only account for regressive eye movements but also provides a framework able to model eye movement control during reading across different scenarios. Importantly, within the IGF it is assumed that two different types of regressive eye movements exist which differ with regard to their releases (integrations difficulties vs. missing evidence) but also with regard to their time course.We tested the predictions of the IGF by re-analyzing an experiment of Weiss et al. [57] and found, inter alia, clear evidence for shorter fixation durations before regressive saccades relative to progressive saccades, with the exception of the last region. This clearly supports the assumptions of the IGF. In addition, we found evidence that there exists a window of about 15–20 characters to the left of the current fixation that plays an important role in target selection, probably indicating the perceptual span during a regressive saccade.
Highlights
Regressive saccades moving the eyes against the intended reading direction form an integral part of reading behavior
In the last section we described the architecture of the Information Gathering Framework (IGF) and outlined some predictions that can be derived from the framework
In this article we introduced a new eye movement control framework that especially focuses on regressive eye movements during reading: The Information Gathering Framework (IGF)
Summary
Regressive saccades moving the eyes against the intended reading direction form an integral part of reading behavior. The currently processed word (word n) is integrated into higher-level representations such as the syntactic structure or the discourse model In case this integration fails, it causes both an attention shift and a regressive eye movement “back to the point at which the difficulty became evident (i.e., word n), as opposed to some earlier sentence location” The SWIFT model, proposed by Engbert and colleagues (Engbert, Longtin, & Kliegl, 2002; Engbert et al, 2005), is another highly advanced model of eye movement control It assumes that multiple words are processed in parallel while saccades are generated autonomously, selecting the target in a probabilistic manner according to the activation levels of words (Luce’s choice rule). The re-inspection threshold prevents the word from being selected as a regression target on the basis of explicit linguistic processing
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
