Abstract
We evaluate the information content of analysts’ reports and bankruptcy risk quantities towards each other, and examine whether differences arise between low- and high-risk firms and between stock recommendations and earnings forecasts. We reveal that past changes in analysts’ reports convey valuable information towards future developments in default risk measures, analysts’ outcome rely upon lagged modifications in corporate creditworthiness, and the predictive power in both directions is more pronounced among high risk enterprises. Furthermore, default likelihoods and analysts’ recommendations and forecasts Granger cause each other, generating a significant feedback system. Moreover, earnings forecasts portray more profound relations to credit risk quantities than stock recommendations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
