Abstract

In this chapter I want to carry on with issues raised in its predecessor. The position that I take here is that if informal logic can lay claim to a coherent research programme it is incumbent on its practitioners to display the programme concretely. In the preceding chapter I argued that a degree of formality is needed for informal logic. In the present chapter I return the compliment, claiming that informality is an irreducible part of formal logic.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call