Abstract

The authors consider the problematic field of conflictogenic media space in a linguistic-legal aspect. The goal of the article is to present the individual results of linguistic and psycholinguistic studies of polycode controversial texts. In expert practice the authors actively employ the emotional-lexical assessment of verbal and non-verbal models, the assessment of the rhythmic brain activity during the perception of the entire text, the assessment of the rhythmic coherence in the perception of individual parts of the text and their comparison, the technique for recognizing the hidden motives of the object behavior in the process of its professional activity, analysis of the individual coefficients of the text impact on the individual and mass consciousness and subconsciousness. Conflict genes are demonstrated and described in this work. These are the minimum significant units of the component of the conflictogenic media space. The specific character of the polycode text, the texture of which consists of verbal and non-verbal parts, is demonstrated. The quantitative and qualitative results of the research performed are determined by the potential of classical linguistics and related branches of knowledge for solving polycode text problems using the developed software products in the field of psycholinguistic investigations.

Highlights

  • From an expert and analytical point of view, the conflictogenic zone of the modern media space is considered by us 1) as a fragment of the socio-discursive field, which reflects the "communicative battles and fights" taking place in it, whose participants, being subjects of the network sociocultural system, violate the norms of speech behavior and subsequently act as plaintiffs / defendants in litigations; 2) as a linguo-ecological environment that has a public character, the signs of which are identified by experts in the published information - in the disputed text

  • In contrast to the linguistic, psychological-linguistic and psychological types of expertise, the PLE is based on specific data from experimental linguistics, which studies the products of human speech activity based on experimental materials

  • Successful results of the formalization of these psycholinguistic (PL) experiments in the form of computer programs have increased the possibilities of using this scientific paradigm in judicial linguo-expert activity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

From an expert and analytical point of view, the conflictogenic zone of the modern media space is considered by us 1) as a fragment of the socio-discursive field, which reflects the "communicative battles and fights" taking place in it, whose participants (journalistsauthors of publications, including "commissioned" ones, and their heroes), being subjects of the network sociocultural system, violate the norms of speech behavior and subsequently act as plaintiffs / defendants in litigations (for example, for the protection of honor, dignity and business reputation - art. 152 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation or for slander and insult – art. 129, 130 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation); 2) as a linguo-ecological environment that has a public character, the signs of which are identified by experts in the published information - in the disputed text (see, in particular, art. 128.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). 129, 130 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation); 2) as a linguo-ecological environment that has a public character, the signs of which are identified by experts in the published information - in the disputed text In contrast to the linguistic, psychological-linguistic and psychological types of expertise, the PLE is based on specific data from experimental linguistics, which studies the products of human speech activity based on experimental materials. Creating a visualized result of the processed data, based on statistics, on the comparison of coupled databases, enriches the expertise and eliminates the subjective interpretation of the speech product

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.