Abstract

Objectiveto explore the influences on women who chose a publicly-funded home birth in one Australian state. Designa constructivist grounded theory methodology was used. Settinga publicly-funded home birth service located within a tertiary referral hospital in the southern suburbs of Sydney, Australia. Participantsdata were collected though semi-structured interviews of 17 women who chose to have a publicly-funded home birth. Findingssix main categories emerged from the data. These were feeling independent, strong and confident, doing it my way, protection from hospital related activities, having a safety net, selective listening and telling, and engaging support. The core category was having faith in normal. This linked all the categories and was an overriding attitude towards themselves as women and the process of childbirth. The basic social process was validating the decision to have a home birth. Conclusionwomen reported similar influences to other studies when choosing home birth. However, the women in this study were reassured by the publicly-funded system׳s ‘safety net’ and apparent seamless links with the hospital system. The flexibility of the service to permit women to change their minds to give birth in hospital, and essentially choose their birthplace at any time during pregnancy or labour was also appreciated. Implications for practicewomen that choose a publicly-funded home birth service describe strong influences that led them to home birth within this model of care. Service managers and health professionals need to acknowledge the importance of place of birth choice for women.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call