Abstract

© 2013 American Psychological Association. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record. The original publication is available at www.apa.org; DOI: 10.1037/a0032627

Highlights

  • Three experiments examined conceptual change from reading refutational texts, and how such learning interacted with prior knowledge organization

  • In Experiment 3 we examined whether readers who did not hold the misconception addressed in the texts experienced performance decrements reading the contrast or refutational text relative to readers of the repetition texts used in those experiments

  • The data from Experiment 1 indicate that presenting a misconception and an accurate conception is insufficient to produce learning beyond that resulting from repetition of the correct conception

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Three experiments examined conceptual change from reading refutational texts, and how such learning interacted with prior knowledge organization. Some have argued that holding a coherent misconception may overwhelm recognition of its inconsistency with the scientific conception (Otero & Kintsch, 1992; Posner, Strike, Hewson, & Gertzog, 1982) This may be the case when instruction does little to highlight the presence of misconceptions and promote their active revision (Chambliss & Calfee, 1998; Champagne, Gunstone, & Klopfer, 1983; Driver & Easley, 1978; Hewson & Hewson, 1984; Pace, Marshall, Horowitz, Lipson, & Lucido, 1989; West & Pines, 1985). There are additional concerns that refutational texts might introduce misconceptions to readers who do not already hold them (Hynd, et al, 1997)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.