Abstract

AbstractTrace N, N‐dimethylformamide(DMF) containing composite polymer electrolytes (CPEs) has attracted much attention owing to the dramatically increased Li+‐conductivity. But the amount of DMF is critical and needs to be clarified for the interfacial stability, since DMF is easily reduced by Li‐metal. Herein, the influences of DMF in poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) based CPEs are studied on the Li+‐conductivity and interfacial stability. In PEO‐based CPEs, owing to a stronger interaction of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfon)imide (LiTFSI) with PEO than DMF, DMF can not be confined and be easily evaporated off. Only ≈0.25wt.% DMF is absorbed on ceramic electrolyte fillers, giving two times increased Li+‐conductivity compared with the DMF‐free counterparts and generating stable interface with Li‐metal; but over much DMF (≥2.2 wt.%) leads to serious interfacial reactions with Li‐metal. While in PVDF‐based CPEs, ≈8wt.% DMF is confined by LiTFSI owing to a stronger interaction of LiTFSI with DMF than with PVDF. Short‐term stable interface with Li‐metal can be obtained, but longer‐term cycling or higher current density leads to the gradually aggravated reactions with Li‐metal. Thanks to the high‐voltage stability of PVDF based CPEs, better cycling performance is obtained when they are used as catholytes to match high‐voltage cathodes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.