Abstract

We experimentally study the influence of wall roughness on bubble drag reduction in turbulent Taylor–Couette flow, i.e. the flow between two concentric, independently rotating cylinders. We measure the drag in the system for the cases with and without air, and add roughness by installing transverse ribs on either one or both of the cylinders. For the smooth-wall case (no ribs) and the case of ribs on the inner cylinder only, we observe strong drag reduction up to DR$=33\,\%$ and DR$=23\,\%$, respectively, for a void fraction of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}=6\,\%$. However, with ribs mounted on both cylinders or on the outer cylinder only, the drag reduction is weak, less than DR$=11\,\%$, and thus quite close to the trivial effect of reduced effective density. Flow visualizations show that stable turbulent Taylor vortices – large-scale vortical structures – are induced in these two cases, i.e. the cases with ribs on the outer cylinder. These strong secondary flows move the bubbles away from the boundary layer, making the bubbles less effective than what had previously been observed for the smooth-wall case. Measurements with counter-rotating smooth cylinders, a regime in which pronounced Taylor rolls are also induced, confirm that it is really the Taylor vortices that weaken the bubble drag reduction mechanism. Our findings show that, although bubble drag reduction can indeed be effective for smooth walls, its effect can be spoiled by e.g. biofouling and omnipresent wall roughness, as the roughness can induce strong secondary flows.

Highlights

  • In the maritime industry, air lubrication is seen as one of the most promising techniques to reduce the overall fuel consumption (Kodama et al 2000; Foeth 2008; The influence of wall roughness on bubble drag reduction in TC turbulence 437Mäkiharju, Perlin & Ceccio 2012)

  • We are more interested in the relative bubbly drag reduction as compared to the smooth-wall case, rather than the absolute friction increase by roughness

  • We studied the influence of wall roughness on bubble drag reduction in a highly turbulent flow

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Air lubrication is seen as one of the most promising techniques to reduce the overall fuel consumption (Kodama et al 2000; Foeth 2008; The influence of wall roughness on bubble drag reduction in TC turbulence 437Mäkiharju, Perlin & Ceccio 2012). A limited number of studies focused on ‘non-ideal’ DR, either through wall roughness (Deutsch et al 2004; Van den Berg et al 2007; Elbing et al 2008, 2013), surfactants or seawater (Takahashi et al 2001; Winkel et al 2004; Shen, Perlin & Ceccio 2006; Elbing et al 2008; Verschoof et al 2016), and their results are somewhat inconsistent. A third study showed that roughness can even enhance drag reduction (Deutsch et al 2004) Given this variety of conclusions, there is a clear need to better understand the influence of wall roughness on bubble drag reduction

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.