Abstract

The strong wind-induced current and sea level have influences on the wave distribution in a tropical cyclone (TC). In particular, the wave–current interaction is significant in the period in which the TC passed the mesoscale eddy. In this study, the wave fields of Typhoon Chan-hom (2015) are hindcastly simulated using a coupled oceanic model that utilizes a nested triangle grid, i.e., the finite-volume community ocean model-simulating waves nearshore (FVCOM-SWAVE) model. The forcing wind field is composited from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis data and the simulation using a parametric Holland model, denoted as H-E. The open boundary fields include tide data from TPOX.5 and the hybrid coordinate ocean model (HYCOM) global datasets, including sea surface temperature (SST), sea surface salinity, sea surface current, and sea level data. The simulated oceanic parameters (e.g., the significant wave height, SWH) are validated against the measurements from the Jason-2 altimeter, yielding a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.58 m for the SWH, a correlation (COR) coefficient of 0.94, and a scatter index (SI) of 0.23. Similarly, the simulated SSTs are compared with the remote sensing products of the remote sensing system (REMSS) and the measurements from Argos, yielding an RMSE of <0.8 °C, a COR of >0.95, and an SI of <0.04. The significant zonal asymmetry of the wave distribution along the typhoon track is observed. The Stokes drift is calculated from the FVCOM-SWAVE simulation results, and then the contribution of the Stokes transport is estimated using the Ekman–Stokes numbers. It is found that the ratio of the Stokes transport to the total net transport can reach >80% near the typhoon center, and the ratio is reduced to approximately <20% away from the typhoon center, indicating that Stokes transport is an essential aspect in the water mixing during a TC. The mesoscale eddies are detected by the sea level anomalies (SLA) fusion data from AVISO. It is found that the significant wave heights, Stokes drift, and Stokes transport inside the eddy area were higher than those outside the eddy area. These parameters inside the cold mesoscale eddies were higher than t inside the warm mesoscale eddies. Otherwise, the SST mainly increased within the cold mesoscale eddies area, while decreased within the warm mesoscale eddies area. The influence of mesoscale eddies on the SST was in proportion to the eddy radius and eddy EKE.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call