Abstract

Given that any construction project is inherently a human endeavour, it follows that issues of trust are significant in terms of the stakeholder interactions that deliver eventual project outcomes. Previous research indicates that the relational basis upon which projects are undertaken are intended to influence the likelihood of trusting relationships between stakeholders. Thus, experiences of trust in a construction project environment are likely to be influenced by the contextual specifics of respective transactional and relational contracting (RC) procurement mechanisms, given the divergent theoretical principles upon which they are founded. The influence of trust has therefore been examined through the lived experiences of construction practitioners. A phenomenological interview study consisting of thirty-five (35) participants was conducted with sensitivity to the procurement of experiences being recounted. Issues of trust were shown to be integral to stakeholder experiences in both procurement environments, with the benefits of trust acknowledged in many instances. However, little understanding was evident regarding methods for building and maintaining trust, nor for repairing trust when problems arose. Importantly, despite the differing principles that underpin transactional and relational procurement, and particularly the contention that relational procurement would increase trust between trading partners, this was not evident; with individual personalities and appropriate risk apportionment shown to be greater influences upon the likelihood of trusting relationships. It is reasonable to conjecture that relational contracts actually diminish the need for trust, given that the objective is to reduce uncertainty through formulaic approaches to risk distribution and reward; the absence of risk negates the need for trust. Ultimately, the potential to deliver improved project outcomes as a result of proactive approaches to developing and maintaining trust, as well as repairing trust after difficulties, was shown to apply under all procurement conditions.

Highlights

  • The issue of trust is fundamental to all aspects of human interaction (Gad and Shane, 2014), and given the human component required to deliver any construction endeavour (Lechler, 1998), trust and dimensions of trust are significant

  • Whilst it is clearly the case that trust is an interpersonal phenomenon that arises out of some sort of power imbalance, much has been written in relation to the influence of alternate procurement instruments used for construction projects and the likelihood of a trusting relationship eventuating between client and contractor (Che Ibrahim, Costello and Wilkinson, 2011; Gad and Shane, 2014; Guo, Lu and Song, 2013; Kumaraswamy et al, 2005a; Laan et al, 2011)

  • The results of the pair wise comparison process have provided enlightenment regarding the influence of trust on stakeholder experiences within both transactional and relational construction project environments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The issue of trust is fundamental to all aspects of human interaction (Gad and Shane, 2014), and given the human component required to deliver any construction endeavour (Lechler, 1998), trust and dimensions of trust are significant. An investigation of trust related issues requires a clear understanding of what is meant by trust and the various dimensions associated with it (e.g. formation, maintenance, loss, repair, and so on) before meaningful research can be undertaken. Such a framework of concepts and explanations has been constructed and reported elsewhere (Brewer and Strahorn, 2012) and underpins this current investigation. It should be clearly understood that the nature of trust and trusting relationships remains constant irrespective of the context – or procurement mechanism – under which it is exercised. It follows that trusting intentions– or absence thereof – will be shaped by the context within which they occur (i.e. the procurement context)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call