Abstract

AimTo evaluate the effect of irrigant refreshment and exposure time of a 2% sodium hypochlorite solution (NaOCl) on biofilm removal from simulated lateral root canal spaces using two different flow rates.MethodologyA dual‐species biofilm was formed by a Constant Depth Film Fermenter (CDFF) for 96 h in plug inserts with anatomical features resembling an isthmus or lateral canal‐like structures. The inserts were placed in a root canal model facing the main canal. NaOCl 2% and demineralized water (control group) were used as irrigant solutions. Both substances were applied at a flow rate of 0.05 and 0.1 mL s−1. The samples were divided into three groups with zero, one or two refreshments in a total exposure time of 15 min. A three‐way analysis of variance (anova) was performed to investigate the interaction amongst the independent variables and the effect of consecutive irrigant refreshment on percentage of biofilm removal. A Tukey post hoc test was used to evaluate the effect of each independent variable on percentage biofilm removal in the absence of statistically significant interactions.ResultsFor the lateral canal, NaOCl removed significantly more biofilm irrespective of the number of refreshments and exposure time (P = 0.005). There was no significant effect in biofilm removal between the consecutive irrigant refreshments measured in the same biofilm. For the isthmus, NaOCl removed significantly more biofilm irrespective of the number of refreshments and exposure time; both NaOCl and a high flow rate removed significantly more biofilm when the exposure time was analysed (P = 0.018 and P = 0.029, respectively). Evaluating the effect of consecutive irrigant refreshment on the same biofilm, 2% NaOCl, 0.1 mL s−1 flow rate and one or two refreshments removed significant more biofilm (P = 0.04, 0.034 and 0.003, <0.001, respectively).ConclusionsIn this model, refreshment did not improve biofilm removal from simulated lateral root canal spaces. NaOCl removed more biofilm from the lateral canal‐ and isthmus‐like structure. A higher flow rate removed significantly more biofilm from the isthmus‐like structure. There was always remaining biofilm left after the irrigation procedures.

Highlights

  • Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is the irrigant of choice during root canal treatment (Zehnder 2006, Dutner et al 2012)

  • In the absence of statistically significant interactions, a main effect analysis was carried out in order to investigate the Chemical effect of the irrigant on biofilm removal Three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed no significant interaction amongst the independent variables on percentage biofilm removal

  • Effect of irrigant refreshment on biofilm removal measured after 15 min Three-way ANOVA revealed no significant interaction amongst the independent variables on percentage biofilm removal

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is the irrigant of choice during root canal treatment (Zehnder 2006, Dutner et al 2012). It has gained its popularity mainly due to its action against microorganisms (McDonnell & Russell 1999) and biofilm (Arias-Moliz et al 2009, Bryce et al 2009) as well as its capacity to dissolve pulp tissue (Sirtes et al 2005) and organic components of the smear layer (Baumgartner & Mader 1987). Biofilms withstand NaOCl treatment (Stewart et al 2001), which is corroborated in in situ investigations of root canal specimens (Nair et al 2005, Ricucci & Siqueira 2010). Achieving a better understanding of the properties of NaOCl is warranted in order to improve its antibiofilm efficacy

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call