Abstract

A single administration of the neuroprotective peptide NAP was previously shown to protect against death associated with closed head injury (CHI) and enhance recovery of the surviving mice. The protective effect was accompanied by down-regulation of the relative mRNA content of the complement receptor 3 (Mac-1, a marker for inflammation) as measured about a month after the injury. In contrast, the mRNA transcripts for activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP, the NAP containing protein) were shown to increase 29 days post CHI in the injured hemisphere of Mac-1 expressing mice. The present study was set out to investigate: (1) are Mac-1-deficient mice less susceptible to the adverse outcome of traumatic head injury; (2) does NAP treatment affect Mac-1-deficient mice subjected to head injury; and (3) is Mac-1 expression associated with ADNP expression. Results showed that (1) Mac-1-deficient mice were partially protected against death associated with severe head injury as compared to Mac-1 expressing mice. (2) Significant protection against death was observed in NAP-treated mice and an increase in recovery was observed in the NAP-treated Mac-1 mice 4 weeks after injury. (3) ADNP expression did not change in the Mac-1-deficient mice following head injury. Our working hypothesis is that a month following injury, gene expression in the injured brain is altered and competing proteins are expressed such as Mac-1 that is associated with inflammation and ADNP that is associated with neuroprotection. Obviously, this plasticity in gene expression is intimately interwoven with the genetic background of the animal. NAP treatment tilts the balance toward neuroprotection.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.