Abstract

The present study compared the acute effect of different combinations of resistance training (RT) and static stretching (SS) on the heart rate (HR), rate pressure product (RPP) and oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) of participants. This is a cross-over methodological design carried out in five visits on non-consecutive days, which always occurred at the same time of day. Twelve trained young men were randomly divided, using counterbalanced and alternate assignments, into three experimental situations: a) horizontal abduction of the shoulder, knee flexion and hip abduction before the bench press and leg extension machine, respectively (SS + RT); b) bench press and leg extension machine before horizontal abduction of shoulder, knee flexion and hip abduction, respectively (RT + SS); c) bench press and leg extension machine, exclusively (RT). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures showed significant differences in the SS+RT group when the variables were compared at rest (pre) and immediately after the exercises (post): HRpre vs. HRpost (p = 0.000) and RPPpre vs. RPPpost (p = 0.000). In the intergroup comparisons, significant differences were detected between the SS+RT and RT+SS experimental situations exclusively during the post period for the RPP (p = 0.041) and SpO 2 variables (p = 0.002). The combined use of SS and RT significantly changed the intragroup cardiovascular responses by increasing the HR and RPP and decreasing the SpO 2 . However, the values were lower in the intergroup comparisons when the stretching exercises were performed both before and after RT, although no significant differences were found from a cardiovascular safety point of view.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM, 2011) suggests that strength and flexibility are key components for good physical fitness and should be included in any physical activity and healthrelated quality of life program

  • Significant differences were detected in the static stretching (SS)+resistance training (RT) group when the following time periods were compared for variables in the intragroup comparisons: HRpre vs. HRpost (70.08 ± 2.71 vs. 93.08 ± 2.32, p < 0.001), RPPpre vs. RPPpost (8,205.17 ± 884.77 vs. 11,218.92 ± 1,137.30, p < 0.001) (Table 1)

  • This study compared the acute effect of the order of RT and stretching (RT + SS vs. SS + RT) on the heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), rate pressure product (RPP), and SpO2 of participants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM, 2011) suggests that strength and flexibility are key components for good physical fitness and should be included in any physical activity and healthrelated quality of life program. Satisfactory levels of flexibility and strength are essential for developing and maintaining health and functionality and for performing daily activities and sports movements effectively (ACSM, 2011). Stretching and RT should be included in the exercise routine of different populations, despite their concurrent effects (Williams et al, 2007; ACSM, 2011). Variations in the heart rate (HR) response as a function of performing stretching exercises and RT are still underreported in the literature (Farinatti et al, 2011; Majock, Kim, Eccles, & Panton, 2011). The only studies to date that have analyzed the effects of muscle stretching on SpO2 were those of McCully (2010) and Costa e Silva et al (2013)

Material and methods
Experimental procedures
Results and discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call