The influence of the extent of target organs on sensitivities of methods for screening rodent carcinogens

Abstract

Two hundred and thirty-three rodent carcinogens from the Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB) were analyzed with CASE (Computer Automated Structure Evaluation), and a comparison of the extents of target organs with the sensitivities for long-term carcinogenic bioassays in rats and mice, Salmonella assay (Sty), electrophilic substructure alert analysis (ESAA) and CASE was made. The carcinogenicity of 233 chemicals was evaluated in both rat and mouse bioassays. The present study showed that the sensitivities of the five methods for screening carcinogens were related to the extents of target organs of carcinogens. Among the carcinogens that did not induce tumors (extent = 0) in rats, the sensitivities of Sty and ESAA were 46 and 53, respectively. Among the carcinogens which induced tumors at a single organ (extent = 1) in rats, the sensitivities were 57 and 64 respectively; and 71 and 80 at multiple organs (extent>1) respectively. The sensitivities of CASE were 76, 82, and 89 respectively at these three different extents. Similar results were obtained with these carcinogens in mice. The results indicate that mutagenic or electrophilic carcinogens are more likely to induce tumors at multiple target organs; in contrast, most carcinogens which induced tumors at only a single target organ in one species are rarely mutagenic or electrophilic. The sensitivities of Sty and ESAA were lower than that of the CASE method in these carcinogens. CASE analyzed chemical structures of many carcinogens and non-carcinogens and then established a database of key fragments, and its parameters are not only based on mutagenicity or electrophilicity of chemicals, and this resulted in a more exact detection of the carcinogenicity of chemicals with the CASE method.