Abstract

This paper describes the research on abrasive machining conditions and their influence on microhardness and residual stresses distribution in the technological surface layer of 20MnCr5 steel. The roughness of ground samples was also measured. Samples underwent a vacuum carburizing process (LPC) followed by high-pressure gas quenching (HPGQ) in a 4D quenching chamber. Processes were realized with a single-piece flow method. Then, the flat surfaces of samples were ground with a Vortex type IPA60EH20VTX alumina grinding wheel using a flat-surface grinder. The samples were ground to three depths of grinding (ae = 0.01; 0.02; 0.03 mm) with grinding fluid supply using either flood method (WET) or minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) method. The condition of the technological surface layer was described using microhardness and residual stresses, as well as some selected parameters of surface roughness. The results obtained revealed that changes in microhardness as compared to microhardness of the material before grinding were lower in samples ground with grinding fluid supplied with MQL method. At the same time, the values of residual stresses were also better for samples ground using MQL method. Furthermore, the use of grinding fluid fed with MQL method produced lower values of surface roughness compared to the parameters obtained with WET method. It was concluded that for the tested scope of machining conditions, the MQL method can be a favourable alternative to the flood method of supplying grinding fluid into the grinding zone.

Highlights

  • The grinding process can change surface layer properties such as fatigue strength, corrosion resistance and abrasion resistance [1,2]

  • Microhardness tests carried out after grinding showed that the smallest changes as compared to the microhardness of the material before grinding, are obtained when grinding with grinding fluid fed with minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) method (Figure 5b)

  • As shown by the microhardness distributions presented in Figure 6, the greatest changes in microhardness values for both analysed grinding fluid feeding methods were observed for the grinding depth: ae3 = 0.03 mm (Figure 6c)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The grinding process can change surface layer properties such as fatigue strength, corrosion resistance and abrasion resistance [1,2]. The surface roughness obtained as a result of grinding is influenced by the active roughness of the grinding wheel corresponding to its topography and the specific volumetric productivity of grinding, which results from adopted setting values. Among these setting values, the grinding depth ae is of significant importance [3,4], just next to the workpiece speed vw. The analysis of residual stresses is crucial due to their influence on, among others, fatigue strength, tribological wear, corrosion, brittle fracture and contact fatigue [9]. The occurrence of compressive stresses in the surface layer compensated by tensile stresses in the core is believed [10,11] to contribute to the fatigue strength

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call