Abstract
The current study examined the influence of testimonial aids (e.g., testifying behind a screen), in combination with victim-defendant familiarity, and victim age, on mock jurors’ judgments in a sexual offence case. The sample included undergraduate mock jurors (N = 256) who read a trial summary and answered questions regarding their perception of defendant guilt and defendant and victim credibility. Mock jurors were impacted by the use of testimonial aids, such that they were more likely to render a guilty verdict and assign higher guilt ratings to the defendant, as well as perceive the victim more positively when a testimonial aid was used compared with testifying live in court. The use of a testimonial aid also interacted with victim-defendant familiarity, such that mock jurors rated the defendant as more guilty when a testimonial aid was used and the defendant was described as a stranger, compared with a familiar family member. The use of testimonial accommodations, in combination with other extralegal factors, impacts mock jurors’ judgments.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
