Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
Technology has entered the human physical and spiritual existence. Technology is the reflection of the human soul in nature, it is the materialization of ideas in the human brain itself. Humans are increasingly fragmented and machines are increasingly dominant in human life, which causes problems in various fields, one of the fields is a law on the formulation of criminal acts in various legislation. To clarify this problem, normative research methods are used with a focus on comparative legislation. Laws of increasingly technological and technological nature adopt legal features in the work of science and technology. Lawmakers make rules that reflect technological determinism as well as against it. They glorify technology as well as make technology as one of the factors of criminal liability. This seems in the comparison between general criminal law legislation that originates from the Criminal Code with other laws and regulations that contain technological elements. Technology-based criminal penalties in general criminal law are unknown, and this only arises after the technology is used to commit criminal acts, such as in criminal acts of decency, humiliation, defamation, and crime dimension technology. This rationale needs to be deciphered considering the lawmakers is poor to give an explanation.
Highlights
Every country believes that the science and technology are the one of an important factor in sustaining the growth and progress of the state and in the context of economic development, technology can play a role as an engine of economic growth [1]
Until now there is an opinion that states that technology is the main actor behind the social changes that exist in society
Marxist thought is unclear about this, but it is clear that Marxist economic determinism in its reality is technological determinism, because the control of the means of production - which, according to Marx, is the basis for all economic and social systems - is primarily a function of character that changes from the way of production [20]
Summary
Every country believes that the science and technology are the one of an important factor in sustaining the growth and progress of the state and in the context of economic development, technology can play a role as an engine of economic growth [1]. The law works through an organization so it can be known who is acting as what on the legal mode of production track, but they are interconnected and working towards the perfection of the "legal machine" Another fact is the use of the term which later became the "law as a tool of social engineering" doctrine, which was first introduced by Roscou Pound [5, 6]. The first step in crime prevention in such a way of thinking is by making the rules (written) in the legislature as a law-making machine The workings of this machine have peculiarities that may not be the same as the workings of machines in general, because the human involved in, not a tool. This paper will compare the results of how the machine works against several laws that make technology one of the reasons for the law, and its effect on the development of theory in criminal law, especially on the question of the reasons for criminal liability
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
