Abstract

In corrosion assessment, ultrasonic wall-thickness measurements are often presented in the form of a color map. However, this gives little quantitative information on the distribution of the thickness measurements. The collected data can be used to form an empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF), which provides information on the fraction of the surface with less than a certain thickness. It has been speculated that the ECDF could be used to draw conclusions about larger areas, from inspection data of smaller sub-sections. A detailed understanding of the errors introduced by such an approach is required to be confident in its predictions. There are two major sources of error: the actual thickness variation due to the morphology of the surface and the interaction of the signal processing algorithm with the recorded ultrasonic signals. Parallel experimental and computational studies were performed using three surfaces, generated with Gaussian height distributions. The surfaces were machined onto mild steel plates and ultrasonic C-scans were performed, while the distributed point source method was used to perform equivalent simulations. ECDFs corresponding to each of these surfaces (for both the experimental and computational data) are presented and their variation with changing surface roughness and different timing algorithms is discussed.

Highlights

  • Corrosion is a significant problem in the oil and gas industry

  • 0001-4966/2014/136(6)/3028/12 standard transducers will be affected in the same way. It is the aim of this paper to describe the effect of the surface roughness and the choice of timing algorithm on ultrasonic thickness measurements taken using a longitudinal probe

  • In industry most scans are performed as contact scans as it is infeasible to use immersion scans for in-service pipework

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Corrosion is a significant problem in the oil and gas industry. Estimates put its cost to the petroleum sector at around $8 billion annually in the USA alone. To track the progress of corrosion, the regular inspection of vulnerable infrastructure is required. The CDF calculated from the inspection can be used to make an assessment of the remaining area In order for this to be effective, an understanding of the errors associated with C-scans of rough surfaces is required. Jarvis and Cegla investigated the stability of three commonly used timing algorithms used to extract wall thickness measurements from signals collected using a permanently installed shear wave monitoring system.. 0001-4966/2014/136(6)/3028/12 standard transducers will be affected in the same way It is the aim of this paper to describe the effect of the surface roughness and the choice of timing algorithm on ultrasonic thickness measurements taken using a longitudinal probe. We begin by describing a typical C-scan set up, methods of generating known rough surfaces and commonly used timing algorithms (Sec. II).

Corrosion mapping
Surface roughness
Timing algorithms
Envelope peak detection
Cross-correlation
Threshold first arrival
MODELING REFLECTED ULTRASONIC SIGNALS
Frequency domain calculations
Time domain
Passive point source density
Backwall size
Modeling a C-scan
Experimental set-up
Machining a roughness profile
Standard deviations of the thickness measurements
Frequency dependence
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call