Abstract

In our previous researches (see ECSOC-16, 2012) we found the interesting dependencies of the protons chemical shift values in unsubstituted, 1-monomethyl- and 1,1-dimethylsubstituted arylpropanes Ar-C1R1R2-C2H22–C3H33 NMR 1H spectra upon the number of methyl groups R. In continuation of this topic we investigate the similar dependencies in 1,1,2,2-tetrasubstituted arylpropanes. In this paper we describe results for forty families of 1,1,2,2-tetrasubstituted arylpropanes of general formula Ar-C1R1Y-C2R2Z–C3H33 with various types of R1, R2, Y, Z substituents. We suppose that under recording spectra conditions the intramolecular interaction between unbound by chemical bonds aryl fragment (Ar) and studied methyl group (C3H33) take place. This interaction leads to change of studied methyl group (C3H33) chemical shift value, which we investigate. For this purpose we have analyzed the literature 1H NMR spectral data of C3H33 proton chemical shifts in these compounds. We calculate the differences between the C3H33 chemical shifts of studied 1,1,2,2-tetrasubstituted arylpropane and two different etalon (reference) compounds. Previously, we found that the optimal "desired" standard etalon compound and additional etalon compound are respectively tetrasubstituted pentane of general formula H5C2– C1YR1 – C2ZR2 – C3H3 and propanol of general formula HO – C1YR1 – C2ZR2 – C3H3. In the absence in used literature sources the spectral data for the "desired" etalon compounds (standard and additional), we used the appropriate parameter of similar in structure substances, named as "forced" etalon compounds (standard and additional). The chemical shifts (base spectral parameters) of the studied methyl group of all 40 families of compounds Ar-C1R1Y-C2R2Z–C3H33 are in the range from 0.4 ppm to 1.7 ppm. Using differential parameters allows us to compare such compounds families, in which studied chemical shifts are equal to, for example, 0.5 ppm and 1.5 ppm. We calculate and discuss the mean base and differential spectral parameter values for all 40 families of compounds Ar-C1R1Y-C2R2Z–C3H33. There were founded some interesting regularities of influence of substituents (particularly those containing heteroatoms) R1, R2, Y, Z location and structure on studied methyl group (C3H33) chemical shift value.

Highlights

  • While analyzing the peculiarities of NMR 1H and 13C spectra of different classes of organic compounds we suppose that under recording spectra conditions the intramolecular interactions between unbound fragments of molecule may take place through the space

  • DSP parameters in all discussed compounds IV are calculated according to the formula: DSP = ΔδСН3Н,Nn = δСН3Н,Nn - δСН3Н,etal. To distinguish it from the basic parameters (BSP) in the proposed notation for indication of the differential parameters (DSP) we introduce in the first position letter «D», and give the number of the substance, ie. : differential parameters: "experimental" [standard (D-Nn) = Nn-B - etal-B

  • In the first case (n = a ÷ l) the parameter values 1n-B of 12 compounds is in the range of from 0.902 ppm (1b, aryl fragment (Ar) = p-H2N-C6H4-) to 0.970 ppm (1f, Ar = p-Br-C6H4-C6H4-); the interval width is ≈ 70 mlrd.; in the second case (n = m ÷ p) the parameter value 1n-B of 4 compounds is in the range of from 0.968 ppm ± 0.008 ppm (1n, Ar = p-HО-C6H4-) to 0.980 ppm (1f, Ar = p-BrC6H4-C6H4-); the interval width is ≈ 10 mlrd

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While analyzing the peculiarities of NMR 1H and 13C spectra of different classes of organic compounds we suppose that under recording spectra conditions the intramolecular interactions between unbound fragments of molecule may take place through the space. The arbitrary division into the fragments is in accordance with functional principle and depends upon the formulated aim, which is the investigation of the spectral parameters of the fragment "M" depending upon the structure of the fragment of the "K". The absence of chemical bonds between atoms of the fragments “K” and “M” is an indispensable condition. Both fragments are bound by chemical bonds only with “medium” fragment “L”, with its opposite sides.

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.