Abstract

This study incorporates solar radiation model and NOx-O3 photochemistry into computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with the standard k-ε model to quantify the integrated impacts of turbulent mixing, solar heating and chemical processes on vehicular passive (CO) and reactive (NOx, O3) pollutant dispersion within two-dimensional (2D) street canyons. Various street aspect ratios (H/W = 1, 3, 5) and solar-radiative scenarios (LST 0900, 1200, 1500) are considered. The initial source ratio of NO2 to NO is 1:10 and the background O3 concentration is 100 ppb (mole fraction). The reference Reynolds numbers are ~106–107 and Froude number ranges from 0.23 to 1.14. Personal intake fraction (P_IF) and its spatially-averaged values at the leeward-side (⟨P_IF⟩lee), windward-side (⟨P_IF⟩wind) and both street sides (⟨P_IF⟩) are adopted to evaluate pollutant exposure in near-road buildings.As H/W = 1 and 3, the clockwise single vortex is formed under neutral condition. Leeward/ground solar heating at LST 0900/1200 slightly enhance such vortex and reduce ⟨P_IF⟩. However, as H/W = 3, the single dominant vortex is separated into two counter-rotating vortices by windward solar heating at LST 1500, thus this ⟨P_IF⟩wind is significantly larger than the neutral case. As H/W = 5, the lower-level secondary anticlockwise vortex appears under neutral condition inducing much weaker wind and extremely higher pedestrian-level concentration. This two-main-vortex structure is destroyed by leeward/ground heating into single-main-vortex pattern, but dissociates into three counter-rotating vortices by windward heating. These three radiative scenarios raise pedestrian-level velocity in neutral case by about two orders, and reduce overall ⟨P_IF⟩ by two times to one order. For all cases, NO2 exposure is generally about 40%–380% larger than passive CO exposure, which indicates the conversion of NO into NO2 by depleting O3 is dominant in present NOx-O3 titration interactions. Finally, solar heating only raises air temperature by up to 2–3 K and influences chemical rate slightly, thus this impact on reactive pollutant dispersion is less significant than its effect by the enhanced turbulent mixing.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call