Abstract

Poverty alleviation resettlement (PAR) is China’s largest-ever resettlement program and one of China’s flagship poverty alleviation initiatives. Resorting to this state-led conversation and development program, the central and provincial governments aim to lift the poor out of the poverty trap and into sustainable livelihoods, by delivering improvements in housing conditions, infrastructure services, public amenities, and living standards. Taking Ankang as an example, this study examines the PAR from the perspective of vulnerability through a household survey conducted in Ankang prefecture of Shaanxi province, China. A total of six townships in Ankang are covered, with 657 valid questionnaires collected. This study shows that there is a difference in exposure, sensitivity, and the adaptive capacity of rural households with different relocation characteristics, hence generating different livelihood vulnerabilities. The PAR generally achieves the target of livelihood vulnerability reduction. Specifically, the project-induced relocation has a significant positive effect on vulnerability, but there is a significant negative correlation between livelihood vulnerability and relocation region, relocation time, and relocation subsidy. Challenges and problems remain to be addressed for the next phases of the PAR, including diminishing the financial burden on those relocated and providing free public transportation services, carrying out community-building programs and updating the household registration institution, balancing the redistribution and sharing of farmland, furnishing assistance measures for employment searches and training in specific skills, and creating an impartial project to safeguard the non-movers from the significant negative impacts on their physical and spiritual dimensions.

Highlights

  • The challenges that environmental concerns have posed to human society in the 21st century exacerbated vulnerability across global and regional scales

  • Exposure is the extent of pressure on a particular area unit [31], which tends to reflect the external shocks encountered by rural households in the Poverty Alleviation Resettlement (PAR) project area

  • Considering relocation type, the exposure of project-induced relocation households (PRHhs) was the highest (0.045), followed by disaster-related relocation households (DRHhs) (0.037), ecological restoration households (ERHhs) (0.034), poverty alleviation households (PAHhs) (0.033), and households relocated by other reasons (ORHhs) (0.028) were the least exposed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The challenges that environmental concerns have posed to human society in the 21st century exacerbated vulnerability across global and regional scales. The questions of how to adapt to and respond to environmental changes, and reduce vulnerability, have drawn continuous global attention [1]. Kates et al (2001) propose that “vulnerability or resilience of natural-social system in special areas” is one of the seven core issues of sustainability science [2]. The examination of vulnerability has become the focus and important analysis tool of scientific research on global environmental change and sustainability science. Due to different research backgrounds and objects, scholars have not reached a consensus yet on the interpretation of definitions and measurements of vulnerability, but generally believe that it is closely related to concepts such as risk, disaster severity, poverty resilience, and capability. Studies on vulnerability gradually have extended from the geoscience field of natural ecosystems to social ecosystems, human earth systems, and human-environment coupling systems

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call