Abstract

Hypotheses are stated about the relationships among the level of task difficulty chosen by a subject in a sequential task, expectancy of success, own outcome and that of a paired subject, and satisfaction with own outcome. Multiple regression analyses were used to test these hypotheses on data from an experiment in which subjects worked in pairs for six trials. It was found that the difficulty level chosen on a given trial was predicted by the difficulty level, the subject's outcome score, and the subject's satisfaction on the previous trial; that level of satisfaction on a trial was predicted by the subject's own outcome score and the difference in outcome scores between the two subjects on that trial; and that expectancy was predicted by difficulty level on the same trial. These results underscore the important mediating role of outcome evaluation in the control of behavior, and are consistent with previous research showing a dependence of evaluation on social comparison processes. Also consistent with previous research is the observed trend over trials to more difficult tasks. The “slope” of this trend depended on the initial difficulty level, a result which is readily accounted for by a simplified version of our hypotheses.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.