Abstract
We analyzed the influence of outflow feedback from two perspectives: turbulent support and potential disruptive effect, of which 694 clumps and 188 have been identified as outflow candidates. For turbulent support, we find the slopes of E turb − R clump (turbulent energy and radius of the clump) and P turb − R clump (turbulent momentum and radius of the clump) have no difference and are consistent with expected values whether there is outflow feedback in clumps or not. The ratios of the outflow energy and momentum to the turbulence energy and momentum (E flow/E turb, P flow/P turb) show that the majority of clumps have not enough energy and momentum to support turbulence. Meanwhile, there is no correlation between the velocity dispersion and radius. For potential disruptive effects, we conclude that it is impossible for the outflow activities to disrupt entire clumps and as the mass of the clumps increases, the clumps becomes harder to destroy. Finally, we do not see evidence that the virial parameter changes significantly whether the clumps have outflow candidates or not.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
