Abstract

To examine the effects of shoe type and stride length reduction on lower-extremity running mechanics and cumulative loading. Within-subject with four conditions: (1) control shoe at preferred stride length; (2) control shoe at 90% preferred stride length; (3) minimalist shoe at preferred stride length; (4) minimalist shoe at 90% preferred stride length. Fourteen young healthy males ran overground at their preferred speed while motion capture, force platform, and plantar pressure data were collected. Peak moments, impulse, mechanical work, and cumulative impulse were calculated at the metatarsophalangeal, ankle, and knee joint, and compared between conditions using a 2×2 factor repeated measures ANOVA. In general, running in minimalist footwear increased measures of loading at the metatarsophalangeal joint and ankle joint (mean increases of 7.3% and 5.9%, respectively), but decreased measures of loading at the knee (mean decrease of 7.3%). Conversely, running with reduced stride length decreased single-stance measures of loading at the ankle and knee joint (ranging from -0.9% to -20.5%), though cumulative impulse was higher at the ankle and lower at the knee. Running in minimalist shoes increased loads at the metatarsophalangeal and ankle joint, which may explain some of the incidence of overuse injuries observed in minimalist shoe users. Decreased ankle loads at 90% preferred stride length were not necessarily sufficient to reduce cumulative loads when impulse and loading cycles were weighted equally. Knee loads decreased more when running at 90% preferred stride length (16.2% mean reduction) versus running in a minimalist shoe (7.3% mean reduction), but both load reduction mechanisms appeared to have an additive effect (22.2% mean reduction).

Highlights

  • Minimalist running shoes are defined by their low weight, finite heel cushioning, minimal difference between heel and toe height, limited stabilization mechanisms, and highly flexible sole

  • foot strike index (FSI) was significantly greater during minimalist running conditions (13.5 ± 1.9% for control shoe vs. 23.1 ± 12.3% for minimalist shoe, p = 0.008), indicating that the center of pressure (COP) at contact was located further anterior during control shoe conditions

  • Epidemiological studies have reported that between 25% to 42% of all running-related injuries occur at the knee,[22,23] and our results suggest that running in minimalist shoes and at 90% preferred stride length (PSL) both represent effective strategies to decrease mechanical loads at this joint

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Minimalist running shoes are defined by their low weight, finite heel cushioning, minimal difference between heel and toe height, limited stabilization mechanisms, and highly flexible sole. Compared to traditional running shoes, minimalist shoe running has been characterized by a more anterior foot strike pattern[1,2] and a reduction in stride length,[3] these results have not been reproduced in some studies.[4]. Alterations in foot strike pattern as well as stride length are known to influence lower-extremity joint loading,[5,6] but the relative influence of stride length reduction in minimalist shoe runners has never been independently nor systematically examined. A forefoot strike running pattern has been associated with increased ankle joint loading,[5,9] no studies have examined metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint mechanics in minimalist shoe running. While stride length reductions have been associated with reductions in lower extremity loading,[10] they are associated with an increased number of loading cycles for a given running distance

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call