The influence of microstructural characteristics on the failure properties of a polybutadiene system

Abstract

AbstractThe stress‐strain characteristic of polymeric binders and solid propellants are dependent on the crosslink density, molecular weight between crosslinks, molecular weight distribution in the binder formulation, volume fraction of filler, and the interaction between the binder and filler particles. This investigation is directed toward elucidation of solid propellant microscopic response and failure mechanisms through characterization of the constitutive effects of crosslink density, molecular weight distribution and curing agent ratio in the binder formulation, and filler fraction. This was accomplished on the ERLA/PBAA propellant system through investigation of three binder formulations with the same curing agent ratio but different crosslink densities; five binder formulations with different curing agent ratios; and four formulations with up to 69.9% by volume of filler.Uniaxial stress‐strain characteristics were determined on each formulation at displacement rates of 0.2 to 20.0 in/min at isothermal test conditions ranging from 75 to −90°F. The failure characteristics of a viscoelastic material represent a curve in the three‐dimensional space of stress, strain, and time. The ultimate property data on each formulation are presented as projections of this failure curve on the stress‐strain, stress‐time, and strain‐time planes, respectively. Relationships are developed for the dependence of the stress‐time, strain‐time, and stress‐strain failure envelopes on the volume fraction of bound rubber, crosslink density, molecular weight distribution and curing agent ration in the binder component, and the volume fraction of filler.