Abstract

Spring migrating sea trout juveniles can be classified as parr, pre-smolt or smolt based on body morphology and osmoregulatory capacity. In this respect, parr are assumed to be less prepared for a marine life and to have lower survival at sea than pre-smolts and smolts. However, the behaviour and survival of these trout phenotypes upon entering the sea is not well known. Using passive integrated transponder telemetry, this study found that the return rate from the sea to the natal river was higher for parr compared to pre-smolts and smolts. Additionally, trout classified as parr generally migrated earlier to the sea and a larger proportion returned to the river after less than one year at sea. The daily mortality rate at sea was comparable among the different phenotypes of trout, suggesting that the higher proportion of returning parr to the river was linked to their shorter duration at sea. These results provide evidence of different life-history strategies for seaward-migrating juvenile sea trout, ultimately affecting their return rate to the natal river. Investigations failing to consider downstream migrating parr and pre-smolts risks neglecting a large part of the anadromous population and may result in inaccurate assessments of sea trout stocks in rivers.

Highlights

  • During the period from March to June in 2008 and 2009, wild sea trout juveniles migrated from the river and likely entered the sea at different developmental stages during their parr-smolt transformation

  • Trout classified as parr generally migrated earlier to the sea than pre-smolt and smolts. This suggests that parr phenotypes were functionally adapted to life at sea and migrated downstream without having completed smoltification, at least with regard to changes in body morphology and coloration

  • An important limitation of the present study is that the sea trout were not recaptured in the river once they returned

Read more

Summary

Materials and Methods

A GLM with a Bernoulli distribution and logit link function was used to assess the probability of fish return (yes/no) from the sea to River Villestrup in relation to fish group (parr, pre-smolt and smolt), year of tagging (2008 and 2009), length at tagging and migration time (day of year). The marine residence time could only be determined for trout that returned to River Villestrup and was calculated as the number of days between tagging until first detection at the PIT-antenna station. We used a GLM with Bernoulli distribution and logit link function to investigate whether fish group (parr, pre-smolt and smolt), year of tagging (2008 and 2009), length at tagging, and migration time (day of year) were associated with sea-age class (0SW and 1 + SW) as a measure for marine residence time. Model validation was performed by visual inspection of the residuals and no violations were encountered

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call