Abstract
AbstractThis paper illuminates one mechanism by which democracy may fail to mitigate income inequality despite a widespread preference against it. When income inequality aversion is prevalent, high‐skilled, higher‐wage workers may adjust their working time to reduce inequality. However, the decrease in societal efficiency due to forgone high‐skilled labor outweighs an increase in efficiency from lower‐skilled workers. This implies that a pivotal worker may reject strong redistribution in favor of overall efficiency. Moreover, if the pivotal voter believes that a socially prevalent aversion already mitigates income inequality, a lower tax preference is further reinforced.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
