Abstract

Pressure from hunting can alter the behavior and habitat selection of game species. During hunting periods, cervids such as elk (Cervus canadensis) typically select for areas further from roads and closer to tree cover, while altering the timing of their daily activities to avoid hunters. Our objective was to determine the habitat characteristics most influential in predicting harvest risk of elk. We captured 373 female elk between January 2015 and March 2017 in the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest and surrounding area of central Utah, USA. We determined habitat selection during the hunting season using a resource selection function (RSF) for 255 adult cow elk. Additionally, we used a generalized linear mixed model to evaluate risk of harvest based on habitat use within home ranges (3rd order selection) as well as the location of the home range on the landscape to evaluate vulnerability on a broader scale. Female elk selected for areas that reduced hunter access (rugged terrain, within tree cover, on private land). Age, elevation and distance to roads within a home range were most influential in predicting harvest risk (top model accounted for 36.2% of AIC weight). Elevation and distance to trees were most influential in predicting risk when evaluating the location of the home range (top model accounted for 42.1% of AIC weight). Vulnerability to harvest was associated with proximity to roads. Additionally, survival in our landscape decreased with age of femaleelk.

Highlights

  • Selection of resources and habitats is a driving force influencing animal population [1]

  • We evaluated harvest vulnerability of elk based on habitat use at two scales: habitat use within home ranges [19] and at a broader scale based on the overall location of the home range on the landscape using the centroid of each home range [36]

  • According to the interaction terms in the model, elk selected for rugged terrain, closer to private land and tree cover during the day compared to nighttime (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Selection of resources and habitats is a driving force influencing animal population [1]. Because resources are not uniformly available across the landscape, organisms select the most beneficial habitats [3]. Selection occurs at multiple scales and has been categorized into specific orders of selection [4]. The broadest of these scales, first order selection, describes selection of a geographic range, while second order narrows the selection further to local sites [5]. Third order selection describes usage patterns of local areas and fourth order selection can describe selection at finer scales (e.g., foraging sites). Selection of habitats may be influenced by quality of forage, risk of predation, competition, energy trade-offs, or anthropogenic influences like development, outdoor recreation, and hunting [6,7,8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call