Abstract

The diversity of wing morphologies in birds reflects their variety of flight styles and the associated aerodynamic and inertial requirements. Although the aerodynamics underlying wing morphology can be informed by aeronautical research, important differences exist between planes and birds. In particular, birds operate at lower, transitional Reynolds numbers than do most aircraft. To date, few quantitative studies have investigated the aerodynamic performance of avian wings as fixed lifting surfaces and none have focused upon the differences between wings from different flight style groups. Dried wings from 10 bird species representing three distinct flight style groups were mounted on a force/torque sensor within a wind tunnel in order to test the hypothesis that wing morphologies associated with different flight styles exhibit different aerodynamic properties. Morphological differences manifested primarily as differences in drag rather than lift. Maximum lift coefficients did not differ between groups, whereas minimum drag coefficients were lowest in undulating flyers (Corvids). The lift to drag ratios were lower than in conventional aerofoils and data from free-flying soaring species; particularly in high frequency, flapping flyers (Anseriformes), which do not rely heavily on glide performance. The results illustrate important aerodynamic differences between the wings of different flight style groups that cannot be explained solely by simple wing-shape measures. Taken at face value, the results also suggest that wing-shape is linked principally to changes in aerodynamic drag, but, of course, it is aerodynamics during flapping and not gliding that is likely to be the primary driver.

Highlights

  • Birds exhibit a remarkable range of wing morphologies and flight styles

  • We present the first statistically validated quantitative assessment of the aerodynamic properties of static wings from birds that differ in their flight styles The findings suggest that the differences in morphology associated with differing flight styles manifest only in differences in drag and not lift performance as Cdrag, min but not Clift, max differed between flight style groups

  • Differences between flight style groups in the incremental responses of aerodynamic parameters to morphological measures, indicate that general wing-morphological measures based upon planform cannot alone predict the gliding performance of avian wings as fixed lifting surfaces

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Birds exhibit a remarkable range of wing morphologies and flight styles. Aerodynamic theory, primarily derived from aeronautical research, broadly explains the basis for many of the observed avian wing types. Birds operate at intermediate, transitional Reynolds numbers (Re ≈ 105) and have twisted, roughened wings composed of discreet, deformable elements (Carruthers et al, 2010). The former property makes birds of interest to the designers of unmanned air vehicles (UAVs), which operate at similar transitional Re. Despite broad interest regarding the aerodynamics of avian flight, there are relatively few comparative, empirical studies relating wing morphology to measured aerodynamic parameters

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call