Abstract

Understanding the drivers of species distribution is an important topic in conservation biology and ecology, pertaining to species traits like dispersal strategies and species–environment interactions. Here we examined the drivers of benthic species distribution at 20 sections of a second-order stream network. Environmental and spatial factors and the dispersal modes of the organisms were considered. We expected that species with aerial dispersal capabilities like insects would be less restrained by distance between sites and thus mostly affected by environmental factors. In contrast, we hypothesized that completely benthic species would mainly be affected by spatial factors due to limited dispersal. However, microscopic species like nematodes characterized by a high passive dispersal potential may be less limited by spatial factors. When using redundancy analyses and subsequent variance partitioning, the included variables explained 24% (insects), 24% (non-flying macrobenthos), and 32% (nematodes) of the variance in the respective community composition. Spatial factors mainly explained the species composition of all tested groups. In contrast with other larger species, nematodes were characterized by fine-scale patterns that might have been induced by random processes (e.g., random distribution and priority effects). Our study showed that dispersal processes are crucial in shaping benthic communities along streams albeit the relatively small sampling area (max. distance between sampling sites: 2 km). The demonstration of spatial factors as important drivers of the species distribution of passively dispersing benthic organismal groups highlights the role played by connectivity in determining species distribution patterns in river systems.

Highlights

  • Benthic metacommunities within a stream system are in continuous flux due to dispersal (Bruno et al 2012)

  • The meiobenthos was dominated by rotifers (49.1%) and nematodes (37.5%), while crustaceans (50.9%) were the largest contributors to the macrobenthos

  • Seventy-three nematode species and 45 macrobenthos species were included in the statistical analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Benthic metacommunities within a stream system are in continuous flux due to dispersal (Bruno et al 2012). Passive dispersal by water currents and downstream drift is the most common mode of dispersal for all benthic invertebrates susceptible to flow velocity and direction (Lancaster et al 1996; Bruno et al 2012), whereas most macrobenthic taxa (organisms retained on a 500-lm mesh) are able to actively move over longer distances. Some adult insects actively head to sites conducive to oviposition (Bentley and Day 1989; Blaustein et al 2004) By contrast, their larvae as well as other non-winged macrobenthic taxa may be confined to the sediment, where they disperse along the watercourse by active upstream and downstream movements over or through the streambed as well as by short drifts (Bruno et al 2012). Whether there is a general upstream or downstream, taxon-specific dispersal mode remains a matter of debate (Jones and Resh 1988; Winterbourn and Crowe 2001; Petersen et al 2004; Macneale et al 2005)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call