Abstract

Turbidity currents distribute sediment across the seafloor, forming important archives of tectonic and climatic change on the Earth’s surface. Turbidity current deposition is affected by seafloor topography, therefore understanding the interaction of turbidity currents with topography increases our ability to interpret tectonic and climatic change from the stratigraphic record. Here, using Shields-scaled physical models of turbidity currents, we aim to better constrain the effect of confining topography on turbidity current deposition and erosion. The subaqueous topography consists of an erodible barrier orientated 1) parallel, 2) oblique and 3) perpendicular to the incoming flow. An unconfined control run generated a supercritical turbidity current that decelerated across the slope, forming a lobate deposit that thickened basinwards before abruptly thinning. Flow-parallel confinement resulted in erosion of the barrier by the flow, enhanced axial velocities, and generated a deposit that extended farther into the basin than when unconfined. Oblique confinement caused partial deflection and acceleration of the flow along the barrier, which resulted in a deposit that bifurcated around the barrier. Forced deceleration at the barrier resulted in thickened deposition on the slope. Frontal confinement resulted in onlap and lateral spreading at the barrier, along with erosion of the barrier and down-dip overspill that formed a deposit deeper in the basin. Acceleration down the back of the barrier by this overspill resulted in the generation of a plunge-pool at the foot of the barrier as the flow impacted the slope substrate. Observations from ancient and modern turbidity current systems can be explained by our physical models, such as: the deposition of thick sandstones upstream of topography, the deposition of thin sandstones high on confining slopes, and the complex variety of stacking patterns produced by confinement. These models also highlight the impact of flow criticality on confined turbidity currents, with topographically-forced transitions between supercritical and subcritical flow conditions suggested to impact the depositional patterns of these flows.

Highlights

  • Turbidity currents are the primary mechanism by which sediment is transported from shallow to deep water (e.g., Kuenen and Migliorini, 1950), where they build the largest sediment accumulations on Earth (e.g., Curray and Moore, 1971; Ingersoll et al, 2003)

  • Physical models of turbidity currents interacting with topographic barriers at incidence angles of 0, 45, and 90°

  • Were created to better understand the effect topography has on natural turbidity currents and their deposits

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Turbidity currents are the primary mechanism by which sediment is transported from shallow to deep water (e.g., Kuenen and Migliorini, 1950), where they build the largest sediment accumulations on Earth (e.g., Curray and Moore, 1971; Ingersoll et al, 2003). Turbidity currents are strongly affected by subaqueous topography (e.g., Ericson et al, 1952; Gorsline and Emery, 1959; van Andel and Komar, 1969) that can be formed by many processes, such as: compressional folding (e.g., Lucente 2004; Morley and Leong, 2008), extensional faulting (e.g., Cullen et al, 2019), contourite drifts (e.g., Heezen et al, 1966; Fuhrmann et al, 2020), or salt diapirism (e.g., Cumberpatch et al, 2020) Understanding the effects this topography exerts on turbidity currents is crucial for the prediction of turbidity current pathways and deposit character (e.g., Kneller and Buckee, 2000). For example, has been used to explain lobe thinning trends (Amy et al, 2004) and stacking patterns (Spychala et al, 2017), oblique confinement has been suggested to cause deflection (Kneller et al, 1991; Haughton, 1994) and acceleration (Kneller and McCaffrey, 1999; Jobe et al, 2017) of incoming flows, and frontal confinement has been postulated as the reason for thick deepwater sandstones deposited up-stream of the confinement (e.g., Bersezio et al, 2005; Stevenson and Peakall, 2010)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call