The influence of cephalostatic ear rods on the positions of the head and neck during postural recordings

Abstract

This study examined the effect of cephalostatic ear rods on the positions of the head and neck. The method error was assessed for postural recordings of the head and neck position made with and without ear rods. A photographic angle was correlated with the postural angles on x-ray film. The material compared 33 dental students who were recorded with ear rods in and with ear rods out. Subjects were chosen randomly to repeat the postural recordings. The differences between the mean for each postural variable were subjected to comparative analysis, using Student's test for paired samples. A significant difference ( p ⩽ 0.05) was found between the means of the inclination of the cervical spine to the true horizontal and the means of the photographic angle. The mean values for the remaining postural variables showed an insignificant but consistent pattern of axial extension of the cervical spine. Cephalostatic ear rods may alter head and neck position during postural recordings. The method error made for recording total head and neck position with ear rods was higher than without ear rods. The difference in the photographic angle was found to have a moderate positive correlation with the difference in the cervical inclination and the total head and neck position. These data suggest that lateral cephalostatics without ear rods may be used to record total head and neck position and the photographic technique may be used as a quick, inexpensive method for the clinician to determine head and neck positional changes before and after treatment.