The influence of body size and phylogeny on trabecular microstructure in the proximal femur and humerus of rodents and primates

Abstract

Life history theory states that organisms maximize their fitness via energetic trade‐offs between various biological functions. It has been well‐established that life history strategy is related to intraspecific variation in body size and that body size predicts some bone microstructural properties, but the relationship between life history strategy and skeletal variation has not been sufficiently examined across multiple mammalian clades. Generally, small‐bodied mammals have “fast” life histories and faster growth rates than large‐bodied mammals, meaning small mammals deposit bone tissue at a faster rate, which may affect skeletal morphology. Therefore, the goal of this study was to conduct a preliminary analysis of trabecular bone structure in the rodent and primate humerus and femur to evaluate the influence of life history traits, particularly body size, on bone properties in a phylogenetically diverse sample. Using a sample of 67 size‐matched adult rodent and primate individuals from 8 extant rodent genera (N=26) and 10 extant primate genera (N=41) ranging in body size from 0.04kg to 70kg, we analyzed trabecular bone structure in the proximal femoral and humeral head. Regression analyses were used to assess associations between trabecular bone properties and body size and one‐way ANOVAs were used to compare bone properties between rodents and primates across three size‐matched classes.Regression results are consistent with previous primate and mammal studies. Bone volume fraction (BV/TV) scales with weak positive allometry in both groups and both elements except for the rodent humerus, which scales isometrically. Degree of anisotropy (DA) varies across all groups and shows no consistent relationship with body size. Trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) increase with body size, while connectivity density (Conn.D) and bone surface density (BS/BV) decrease with body size across both clades and elements. In both groups and both bones, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Conn.D scale with strong negative allometry while BS/BV scales with strong positive allometry. ANOVAs reveal that Tb.Th and Tb.Sp are higher in the primate femur than in the rodent femur for medium and large size classes, while Conn. D is higher in the rodent femur for medium and large size classes. Other bone properties do not show consistent patterns of differences between primates and rodents. Overall, while overlapping confidence intervals for all slopes suggest body size scales similarly with these bone properties across clades, ANOVA results suggest that medium and large bodied rodents have thinner, more numerous trabeculae in the femur compared to similarly‐sized primates. Further investigation is necessary to elucidate the biological significance of this result and the underlying mechanisms driving the observed phenomenon.