The influence of bait position on the catch of target and non-target sharks in a SMART drumline bather protection program

Abstract

There is increasing support for shark bite mitigation measures, such as SMART (Shark-Management-Alert-in-Real-Time) drumlines that minimise impacts on target sharks and other marine animals. On the east coast of Australia, SMART drumlines are used in a shark management program to catch and relocate white (Carcharodon carcharias), tiger (Galeocerdo cuvier), and bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas; herein referred to as target sharks). This study examines the effect of bait position relative to the seabed on SMART drumline catches in eastern Australian waters, aiming to optimise catches of target sharks while reducing bycatch. Over 17 months, SMART drumlines were deployed at Ballina and Evans Head, New South Wales. Trace extensions were attached to 3.2 m standard traces to test the effect of bait height above the seabed on shark catch in an experimental design that alternated bait position every fortnight. White and tiger shark catches accounted for 67% of the total catch, whereas bull sharks were infrequently caught (3%). Bait position above the seabed did not significantly influence catch probability of white and tiger sharks. However, catches of Critically Endangered grey nurse sharks (Carcharias taurus) and false alarm events significantly increased when baits were closer to the seabed. Catches of white and tiger sharks varied throughout the year and were linked to seasonal water temperature changes. The standard traces effectively caught target shark species whilst reducing catches of grey nurse sharks and false alarm events, highlighting that the trace length currently used for NSW SMART drumline deployments is optimal.