Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper addresses the relevance of auditor’s opinion and auditor’s reputation for the creditors of private companies in an environment of low demand for audit quality. By employing archival data from private Spanish firms, we find that Big-4 auditors’ clients bear a lower cost of debt, showing that the selection of a high-quality auditor is relevant for the creditors of the company. We also demonstrate that the content of audit reports is relevant for creditors, as they require a higher cost of debt from firms that have obtained a qualified audit report. The influence of auditor’s opinion on the cost of debt does not depend on type of auditor, suggesting that Big-4 auditors’ clients benefit from their auditor’s reputation, even when they receive a qualified audit report.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.