Abstract

The processing of somatosensory information is hampered on a moving limb. This suppression has been widely attributed to sensorimotor predictions that suppress the associated feedback, though postdictive mechanisms are also involved. Here, we investigated the extent to which suppression on a limb is influenced by backward somatosensory signals, such as afferents associated with forces that this limb applies. Participants grasped and lifted objects of symmetric and asymmetric mass distributions using a precision grip. We probed somatosensory processing at the moment of the grasp by presenting a vibrotactile stimulus either on the thumb or index finger and asked participants to report if they felt this stimulus. Participants applied greater forces with the thumb and index finger for objects loaded to the thumb’s or index finger’s endpoint, respectively. However, suppression was not influenced by the different applied forces. Suppression on the digits remained constant both when grasping heavier objects, and thus applying even greater forces, and when probing suppression on the skin over the muscle that controlled force application. These results support the idea that somatosensory suppression is predictive in nature while backward masking may only play a minor role in somatosensory processing on the moving hand, at least in this context.

Highlights

  • Actively produced ­force[21] discharge more vigorously when the muscle is actively ­contracting[20]

  • Experiment 1 In Experiment 1 we examined whether the strength of somatosensory suppression is influenced by stronger afferent input

  • For each digit, maximal load force was influenced by the mass distribution, with the thumb and index finger applying greater forces when grasping objects loaded to the thumb’s and index finger’s endpoint, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Actively produced ­force[21] discharge more vigorously when the muscle is actively ­contracting[20]. If the strength of somatosensory suppression is sensitive to the transmission of afferent signals, suppression on a limb should depend on the amount of the forces applied by this limb. We asked participants to reach, grasp and lift an object that could have one of three possible mass distributions: left, central and right. Participants were to place their digits on the left and right sides of the object. We expected greater object roll to the left and right for the respective asymmetric mass distributions. If the strength of suppression depends on backward masking mechanisms, suppression should be stronger with increased afferent signals, so we expect stronger suppression on digits that apply stronger forces during object lift-off

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call