Abstract

Psychologists are increasing their use of behavior rating scales as part of their diagnostic assessments. While behavior rating scales have many advantages, there are numerous cautions to using them, particularly for diagnostic purposes. It is unknown, however, how much influence a behavior rating scale has on a professional’s diagnostic impression. Using an experimental design, a national sample of 330 school psychology practitioners from the United States provided diagnostic impressions on one of four scenarios. Two scenarios had evaluation data that supported a diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) with one scenario including behavior rating scale standard scores in the average range and one with scores in the clinically significant range. The other two scenarios had evaluation data that did not support a diagnosis of ADHD but also had one with standard scores in the average range and one with scores in the clinically significant range. The findings revealed that behavior rating scale scores do influence school psychologists’ diagnostic decisions. However, consistent with recommended best practices, other sources of evaluation data have a stronger influence on school psychologists’ diagnostic decisions.

Highlights

  • The assessment and diagnosis of psychological disorders is a common practice of many clinical psychologists and psychiatrists

  • The findings revealed that behavior rating scale scores do influence school psychologists’ diagnostic decisions

  • The results indicated most school psychologists were involved in providing assessment information for an Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) evaluation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The assessment and diagnosis of psychological disorders is a common practice of many clinical psychologists and psychiatrists. Given that the role of assessment and diagnosis is prevalent in applied psychology, it is surprising how little research has been conducted on the influences impacting psychologists’ diagnostic decisions. Examples of related research in the mental health field include the examination of variables influencing diagnostic decisions in psychiatric emergency rooms (Muroff, Jackson, Mowbray, & Himle, 2007), and whether the method of payment influenced diagnostic decisions by psychologists in the clinical setting (Lowe, Pomerantz, & Pettibone, 2007). Groenier, Beerthuis, Pieters, Witteman, and Swinkels (2011) evaluated psychologists’ interviews during the diagnostic process. While they noted that the interviews were unstructured and the diagnostic processes varied across psychologists, in general, appropriate diagnoses were determined

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call