Abstract

Dogs’ remarkable success in living in a human-dominated world rests on a set of adaptations to cohabitation with humans. In this paper, I review the nature of these adaptations. They include changes in reproductive and foraging behavior from their ancestor species, wolves, which can be understood as adaptations to the change from hunting live prey to feeding on human food residues. Dogs also show several changes in social behavior which are more controversial and even somewhat paradoxical. Contrary to theories of canine domestication which view dogs as less aggressive and more cooperative than wolves, several studies show that dogs’ social interactions with conspecifics are more hierarchical and competitive than are wolves’. As scavengers rather than hunters, dogs do not need to cooperate with conspecifics the way that wolves do. But how then can we understand dogs’ willingness to cooperate with humans? I propose an integrated account of dogs’ social behavior that does not assume that dogs need to recognize the species-identity of the individuals with whom they interact. Because of the overlap in formal signals of dominance and submission between dog and human and people’s complete control over the resources dogs need, I propose that people occupy a status of “super-dominance” over dogs. This conception suggests several new lines of research which could shed light on the human-dog relationship to the benefit of both partners.

Highlights

  • Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are by any measure exceptional beings

  • How does a dog know whether it should interact with sheep competitively – as it would with another dog, or cooperatively – as it would with a human? Clearly some more over-arching explanation is needed that does not assume that dogs identify diverse species and bring different social behavior patterns into play depending on that identification

  • Range et al (2019) suggested that dogs’ behavior toward humans could be viewed as “deferential” and that this is consistent with what they view as a “conflict-avoidant” pattern of social interaction with conspecifics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are by any measure exceptional beings. They are the most widespread large mammal (after humans) on this planet. It is implausible to propose that dogs have different programs of social behavior that they bring into play depending on the species identity of the social partners they are interacting with because no mechanism of species identification has ever been proposed. Dogs do not just have social relationships with conspecifics and humans: They may form social bonds with members of other species they interact with during the critical social imprinting period (Coppinger and Coppinger, 2002).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.