Abstract
In our paper we examine why there are two distinct and uniform carsharing business models in the German carsharing industry, one of which is run by incumbents and the other of which is run by grass-roots actors, even though theory suggests that at this point of the industry life-cycle there should be active business model experimentation and multiple different configurations. We make a single case study examining the German carsharing industry as a whole and the development of the business models of four companies in particular: cambio carsharing, stadtmobil group, car2go, and DriveNow. We analyze the data longitudinally from the start of professional carsharing in 1988 to 2016 to uncover the paths of business model development. We discover that the two business models have developed according to different trajectories, because of different institutional logics driving the industry actors. Consequently, we suggest that business model research would benefit from observing the institutional logics driving the different actors. We further argue that institutional logics are especially important when studying sharing economy markets, which are by nature institutionally complex.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.