Abstract

Investigation of the eyeblink response of humans to auditory and tactile stimulation focused on the determinants of the so called incremental stimulus intensity effect. In Experiment 1, two groups of participants were exposed to 100 tones from 60 to 87-dB in intensity. In Group Incremental, the tones increased from 60- to 87-dB in 3-dB steps, whereas participants in Group Random received the same intensities in a pseudorandom order. The performance of the two groups was compared to Group Constant that received all 100 tones at 90-dB intensity and to a fourth group, named “Apparatus” that received no stimulation. In a subsequent testing block, the results indicated that there was less responding to a 90-dB tone in the Incremental than in the other three groups, which replicates the incremental stimulus intensity effect. The novel observation was that there was also significantly less responding in the Incremental than in the other three groups to an untrained tactile stimulus, suggesting that the differences between the conditions may have implicated differences in a more general sensitization, in addition to any differences in stimulus-specific habituation. Experiment 2 demonstrated that repetition of tones at a fixed intensity caused a decrease in responding to the tones, but also an increase in responding to a novel tactile stimulus, as compared to an untrained condition. These results are discussed in terms of the interpretation of the incremental stimulus intensity effect suggested by Davis and Wagner (1969) and the AESOP (Wagner & Brandon, 1989) treatment of habituation and sensitization.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.