Abstract

The pedagogical assumptions underlying the use of groupwork in EFL teaching are examined. It is argued that the practice, which derives from a monolingual setting, underestimates the complex dynamics of code‐switching between target language and mother‐tongue in language learning. In particular, it is argued that it may be counterproductive to attempt to force the target language on personal, pragmatic communications between learners as they attempt to negotiate and manage their own learning. A tapescript of Chinese learners of English in a small group discussion showed that limited competence in the target language was rarely the reason for a switch from English to Chinese. Rather, the switches had a definite function in the negotiation and management of the discussion. Five categories of code‐switch are distinguished, each with a different organisational function. The paper concludes that the primary role of small group discussion FL learning should be in the development of collaborative learning strate...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.