Abstract

Introduction: The association between the incidence of glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies(GADAs) and risk of diabetes in pregnant women is controversial. Here, our aim was to investigate the incidence and clinical relevance of GADA and its association with development of post-delivery diabetes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods: This cohort study was conducted in Torbat–e Heydarieh (Khorasan Razavi, Iran) from October 2015 to March 2017. A total of 147 pregnant women with GDM were included in case group. The control group consisted of 147 healthy controls. A GAD diagnostic kit (Diametra Co.,Italy) was used for diagnosis of GADA. The history of insulin therapy and the development of diabetes one year after delivery were investigated.Results: Of 147 pregnant women with GDM, 9 (6.1%) had GADA in their sera. 14.3% (21 out of 147) of women with GDM had history of insulin therapy. 33.3% (7 of 21) of women who had received insulin developed diabetes one year after delivery. Type 1 and type 2 diabetes were observed in, respectively, 1 (0.7%) and 7 (4.8%) of women with GDM at one year after delivery.At one year after delivery, no women in GADA negative women was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. However, type 2 diabetes was observed in 2.9% of GADA negative pregnant women.Type 1 and type 2 diabetes were also noticed in, respectively, 11.1% and 33.3% of GADA positive mothers at one year after delivery.Conclusion: The prevalence of GADA was 6.1% in diabetic pregnant women. The GADA positivity and history of insulin therapy during pregnancy were significant risk factors for diabetes at one year after delivery. In addition, development of type 1 diabetes was higher in GADA positive pregnant women with GDM than GADA negative women.

Highlights

  • The association between the incidence of glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADAs) and risk of diabetes in pregnant women is controversial

  • Development of type 1 diabetes was higher in GADA positive pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) than GADA negative women

  • There was no significant difference in mean age, body mass index (BMI), family history of diabetes, mean C-peptide level and number of caesarean sections between GADA positive and GADA negative women

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The association between the incidence of glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADAs) and risk of diabetes in pregnant women is controversial. The GADA positivity and history of insulin therapy during pregnancy were significant risk factors for diabetes at one year after delivery. Development of type 1 diabetes was higher in GADA positive pregnant women with GDM than GADA negative women. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) may be diagnosed in pregnant women and is defined as any degree of glucose intolerance.[1] GDM has been estimated to affect 1%-14% of pregnancies.[2,3,4] Recently, the incidence of GDM has been reported to be 4.9% in Gorgan, Iran.[5] In a systematic review and meta-analysis, 3.41% of Iranian pregnant women were reported to have GDM.[6] GDM is a risk factor for pregnancy complications,[4,7] type 1 and type 2 diabetes.[8] The reported global incidence of GDM varies from 2.6% to 70%.9. The presence of these antibodies in some diabetic pregnant women indicate immune process of β-cell destruction

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call