The Incidence of Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

Simple SummaryThe worldwide prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus-positive (EBV+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is undetermined. There is no clearly defined cut-off for EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) positivity in tumor cells by in situ hybridization. A lack of common criteria for positive expression of EBER has been raised as a limitation for interpreting and understanding the geographic and ethnic disparity of prevalence of EBV+ DLBCL. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to establish the proportions of EBV+ DLBCL patients. Results showed that the pooled proportion of EBER positivity was 7.9% in patients with de novo DLBCL. The prevalence of EBV+ DLBCL was significantly higher in Asia and South America compared with Western countries. A tendency for lower pooled proportions was observed in studies using a higher cut-off for EBER positivity. The patients’ age did not significantly affect the prevalence. These findings may improve our current knowledge of the EBV+ DLBCL.The worldwide prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus-positive (EBV+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is undetermined. There is no clearly defined cut-off for EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) positivity in tumor cells by in-situ hybridization. The purpose of this study was to establish the proportions of EBV+ DLBCL patients and influence of the different cut-offs for EBER positivity, geographical location, and age on the prevalence of EBV+ DLBCL. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies published up to May 28, 2020 that reported proportions of EBER positivity in immunocompetent and de novo DLBCL patients. The pooled proportions were computed by an inverse variance method for calculating the weights and the DerSimonian–Laird method. Multiple subgroup analyses were conducted to explore any heterogeneity. Thirty-one studies (8249 patients) were included. The pooled proportion of EBV+ DLBCL was 7.9% (95% CI, 6.2–10.0%) with significant heterogeneity among studies (p < 0.001). The prevalence of EBV+ DLBCL was significantly higher in Asia and South America compared with Western countries (p < 0.01). The cut-offs for EBER positivity (10%, 20%, 50%) and patients’ age (≥50 years vs. <50 years) did not significantly affect the prevalence (p ≥ 0.10). EBV+ DLBCL is rare with a pooled proportion of 7.9% in patients with DLBCL and the geographic heterogeneity was confirmed.