Abstract

<i>Aim:</i> This retrospective study compares the incidence of early recurrence after anatomical versus non-anatomical resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). <i>Patients and Methods:</i> This retrospective study included 26 patients who had a preoperative diagnosis of a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and who underwent anatomical and non-anatomical liver resection. The patients were divided into two groups. AR Group; anatomical resection group (n= 12) and NAR Group; Non-anatomical resection group (n = 14). The effect of the type of resection (anatomic vs non-anatomic) on early HCC recurrence was studied in both groups. Other risk factors that might play a role in early tumor recurrence such as the TNM staging, tumor size, vascular invasion, pathologic grading and high AFP values were also evaluated. <i>Results:</i> During the follow up period, 5 patients (41.7 %) from AR Group and 6 patients (42.9 %) from NAR Group developed recurrence. Mean time of recurrence was 13.05 ± 4.63 versus 12.53 ± 4.12 months (p 0.764). The univariate analysis method was used to analyze different epidemiological, clinical and pathological variables and there was no statistically significant risk factor in both groups in terms of recurrence. The mean disease-free survival was calculated for both groups using Kaplan–Meier curve and it was 16.013±2.324 for AR group versus 15.657±2.765 months for NAR group (p: 0.98). The cumulative overall survival proportion at end of research was 59.6% for AR group versus 69.87% for NAR group. The mean overall survival was 17.956±2.254 months for AR group versus 20.876±1.263 for NAR group (p: 0.21). The recurrence rate was 41.7%% in AR group and 42.9% in NAR group (p = 0.951). This suggests that the type of resection did not have an impact on early recurrence in HCC patients undergoing liver resection. <i>Conclusion:</i> This study concluded that recurrence-free and overall survivals after both anatomical and non-anatomical resection were not significantly different from the statistical point of view. Liver resection in cirrhotic patients should be performed with good expertise and should pursue strict selection criteria. Non-Anatomical resection may be more appropriate in cirrhotic patients with small HCC to preserve adequate functioning hepatic parenchyma and to avoid increased postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Highlights

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is considered one of the most prevalent malignant tumour all around the world [1], and its incidence continues to increase due to various risk factors, hepatitis induced cirrhosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [2,3,4]. hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 3rd largest cause of cancer related deaths, of 500,000 deaths globally every year [5]

  • This was a retrospective study which included 26 patients who had a preoperative diagnosis of a single HCC and who underwent anatomical and nonanatomical liver resection at Surgery Department, Tanta University Hospital Between June 2012 and May 2016, The pre-operative investigations included blood chemistry, hepatitis B & C markers, alphafetoprotein (AFP), abdominal ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), chest radiography with or without liver biopsy based on the diagnostic criteria of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) [19]

  • Left hepatectomy was done in 1 case, right hepatectomy was done in 1 case and left lateral segmentectomy in 5 cases (Figure 6, 7), right posterior sectionectomy in one case (Figure 8) while other segmental resections were done in 4 cases, segment III (SIII) resection in 3 cases and segment VI (SVI) resection in one case

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is considered one of the most prevalent malignant tumour all around the world [1], and its incidence continues to increase due to various risk factors, hepatitis induced cirrhosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [2,3,4]. HCC is the 3rd largest cause of cancer related deaths, of 500,000 deaths globally every year [5]. Non-anatomic resection (NAR) is focused on achieving a non-tumoural liver parenchyma cuff, without taking into account the Glisson's portal pedicles [8, 9]. Due to the underlying liver diseases of most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, such as chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis, NAR is regarded to be beneficial for preserving as much functioning liver parenchyma as possible. Non-Anatomical Liver Resection in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma [10]. AR is able to avoid intrahepatic metastasis and local recurrence due to the invasion of tumour cells along portal veins and their intrasegmental branches [14, 15], and it is recommended as a feasible, effective and safe procedure for HCC [16]. Regarding to long-term survival and recurrence-free survival, no clear evidence is available regarding the superiority of AR compared with NAR

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call