Abstract
The initial coin offering (ICO) market relies on the “wisdom of crowds”, ratings given by the collective opinion of crypto experts, to overcome asymmetric information problems in the fundraising process. We investigate the biases of crypto experts in providing ratings in ICOs. We conjecture that experts are incentivized to provide optimistic ratings to promote ICO fundraising success due to their future opportunities as advisors in subsequent ICOs. We examine our conjectures using ICO ratings on ICOBench.com during the period of 2016 to 2019. Consistent with our conjectures, we find that expert ratings in ICOs exhibit systematic optimism relative to the algorithm-generated objective ratings, and experts who give optimistic ratings to a greater number of fundraising successful ICOs are more likely to be hired as advisors in subsequent ICOs. Further, we find that ICOs with more optimistic expert ratings and ICOs hiring experts as advisors are associated with greater likelihood of fundraising success but not that of exchange listing and one-year survival. We interpret our findings to suggest that the incentive of crypto experts to be hired as ICO advisors and the associated optimism in their ratings help ICO startups raise funds but do not help crypto investors in achieving competitive outcome.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
