The Incentive to Sue: An Option-Pricing Approach

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Incentive to Sue: An Option-Pricing ApproachBradford CornellBradford Cornell Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 19, Number 1Jan., 1990 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467846 Views: 8Total views on this site Citations: 19Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1990 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Julia Shamir, Noam Shamir Third-party funding in a sequential litigation process, European Journal of Law and Economics 52, no.11 (Aug 2021): 169–202.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-021-09707-4Samuel Antill, Steven R. Grenadier Financing the Litigation Arms Race, SSRN Electronic Journal 15 (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3719238Michael I. C. Nwogugu Intangibles Accounting Regulations and the “Global Intangibles Economy”: Belief-Revision, Enforcement Theory and Financial Stability, (Sep 2019): 341–420.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44704-3_5 References, (Nov 2016): 239–280.https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315383149-16William H.J. Hubbard Sinking Costs to Force or Deter Settlement, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 32, no.33 (Dec 2015): 545–585.https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewv029Bruce H. Kobayashi The Law and Economics of Litigation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2613145Martin Mendelski, Alexander Libman Demand for litigation in the absence of traditions of rule of law: an example of Ottoman and Habsburg legacies in Romania, Constitutional Political Economy 25, no.22 (Feb 2014): 177–206.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-014-9158-yMartin Mendelski, Alexander Libman Demand for Litigation in the Absence of Traditions of Rule of Law: An Example of Ottoman and Habsburg Legacies in Romania, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2429309James Fallows Tierney Economic Theory of Bellwether Trials, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1754231Avery W. Katz, Chris William Sanchirico Fee Shifting in Litigation: Survey and Assessment, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1714089Ansley Chua, Bruce Haslem PSLRA and Litigation Backed Investor Speculation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1099050BRUCE HASLEM Managerial Opportunism during Corporate Litigation, The Journal of Finance 60, no.44 (Aug 2005): 2013–2041.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00786.xBarry E. Cushing, David L. Gilbertson Strategic Analysis of Securities Litigation against Independent Auditors, AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 21, no.22 (Sep 2002): 57–80.https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2002.21.2.57Lucian Arye Bebchuk Suits with Negative Expected Value, (Jan 2002): 1951–1954.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_368Moshe Bar Niv (Burnovski), David Feldman Forum Selection in International Business Contracts: Home Bias Portfolio Puzzle and Managerial Moral Hazard, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2001).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.291339Peter Newman S, (Jan 1998): 395–559.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14286-6_4Avery Wiener Katz Indemnity of Legal Fees, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1998).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.57958 William M. Landes Sequential versus Unitary Trials: An Economic Analysis, The Journal of Legal Studies 22, no.11 (Oct 2015): 99–134.https://doi.org/10.1086/468159Frank A. Sloan, Thomas J. Hoerger Uncertainty, information and resolution of medical malpractice disputes, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4, no.44 (Dec 1991): 403–423.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056164