Abstract

I provide simulation evidence that the complex systems framework is well-suited for explaining the historical distribution of U.S. commercial bank failure cascades. I use the complex systems framework to test a model of the efficacy of microprudential (bank-level) ratio-based capital adequacy regulations. I find that these requirements generally have the adverse effect of increasing the likelihood of large failure cascades. This adverse effect is especially pronounced under simulation conditions that mimic economic downturns. If banks use more leverage in response to decreased capital adequacy requirements, the likelihood of failure cascades increases only minimally. These results suggest that existing microprudential capital adequacy requirements might be counterproductive to the goal of mitigating bank failure cascades, and provide theoretical support for a countercyclical capital buffer.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.