Abstract
This paper examines the role that science plays as a tool in collective litigation to substantiate claims. Scientific data and expert testimony are often included to buttress a claim and the admissibility of such evidence is often a conse-quence of the extant evidentiary rules and their application. The article will focus on the multidistrict litigation con-cerning Bisphenol-A (“BPA”) as a case study of the phenomena of scientific tailoring of evidence and its admissibility. BPA is a compound included in the synthesis of plastics and is found in food containers, plastic bottles, and ep-oxy-based coatings used to avert the rusting process of food containers. There is a negligible amount of BPA in several food and beverage products. Several countries along with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Environ-mental Protection Agency (EPA) have marshaled scientific studies that demonstrate the lack of any definable negative health effect attributable to an exposure to trace amounts of BPA. Notwithstanding the conclusions of these scientific inquiries, opponents have asserted that BPA exposure results in an alteration of embryonic hormone levels, thereby impacting their development and later reproductive function. This article will address these issues in addition to the salient question of what role science plays as a tool for collective litigation.
Highlights
BPA is a compound included in the synthesis of plastics and is found in food containers, plastic bottles, and epoxy-based coatings used to avert the rusting process of food containers
Several countries along with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have marshaled scientific studies that demonstrate the lack of any definable negative health effect attributable to an exposure to trace amounts of BPA
Bisphenol-A (“BPA”) is a compound included in the synthesis of plastics and is found in food containers, plastic bottles, and epoxy-based coatings used to avert the rusting process of food containers
Summary
Bisphenol-A (“BPA”) is a compound included in the synthesis of plastics and is found in food containers, plastic bottles, and epoxy-based coatings used to avert the rusting process of food containers. BPA is an endocrine disruptor found in many consumer products including infant formula cans and bottles. It may be affecting the reproductive and metabolic health of infants and children. The six main corporate producers of baby bottles agreed in March 2009 to a ban on the usage of BPA in infant food sources or containers sold in the United States. Proponents of a BPA ban point to the limited scientific data showing its deleterious effects and argue that a comprehensive national plan for control of BPA would be the most effective way to address these problems, because voluntary efforts cannot be monitored or enforced How strong is such scientific evidence and should it be legally admissible to buttress a collective tort claim?
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
