Abstract

AbstractBackground and objectivesEnzymatic hydrolysis has previously been shown to have beneficial influences on the protein functionality of pulse protein isolates. To apply and optimize these benefits in chickpeas, a chickpea protein isolate (CPI) was hydrolyzed with three different proteases (trypsin, pepsin, and papain), to three different degrees of hydrolysis (DH): 5%, 10%, and 15%. Changes to zeta potential, hydrophobicity, water and oil holding capacity (WHC and OHC), as well as solubility, emulsifying, and foaming properties at pH 4.0, 7.0, and 10.0 of the various hydrolysates were then quantified and compared with one another in order to determine optimal hydrolytic conditions.FindingsIncreasing length of enzymatic treatments led to a gradual increase in zeta potential, and a rise in protein hydrophobicity. The solubility of trypsin and papain hydrolyzed CPI proteins increased at pH 10.0, while minor decreases in solubility were noted at pH 7.0. Increasing length of pepsin and papain treatment was noted to improve the water holding capacity (WHC), whereas hydrolysis with all three enzymes led to decreases in oil holding capacity (OHC). The emulsifying activity index (EAI) of the CPI increased following hydrolysis with all enzymes at pH 4.0 and 10.0, while at pH 7.0 no changes were observed. The emulsifying stability index (ESI) of the CPI increased following trypsin treatment at pH 4.0; at pH 10.0 emulsions appeared stable, exhibiting no separation over a 30‐min period. Foaming capacity (FC) increased following enzyme treatments at pH 4.0, pH 7.0, and more dramatically at pH 10.0. Foaming stability (FS) worsened at pH 10.0 following higher levels of trypsin hydrolysis (DH > 10%).ConclusionsApproximately 15% hydrolysis with papain was shown as the best conditions to augment the emulsifying, foaming and water holding properties of a CPI material, potentially allowing for the generation of specialized chickpea protein ingredients.Significance and noveltyA total of nine distinct CPI hydrolysates were generated and compared with one another to determine optimal hydrolytic conditions with respect to the functional properties of the CPI.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call